Healthmonix Advisor

The MIPS Quality Performance Category is replacing PQRS reporting in 2017, folding it into the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System. The Quality portion will comprise 60% of an eligible clinician's MIPS Composite Performance Score for 2017.  To calculate that score, there is significant math involved.  This article will walk you though the calculations and logic used to determine your Quality score, but it is important to note that many data submission vendors will automatically give you a predictive calculation.

In December we posted about a CMS announcement related to ICD-10 diagnosis and procedure code changes, and how this might affect payment adjustments in 2018. At the time CMS had not yet issued their addendum detailing specific code updates for measures being used in the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS), but now that they have, here’s an update:

CMS and the National Library of Medicine (NLM) have published the addendum to the 2016 eCQM specifications which affects ICD-10 Clinical Modification (CM) and Procedure Coding System (PCS) value sets for 2017. Health Quality Measure Format (HQMF) specifications, value set object identifiers (OIDs), and measure version numbers for 2017 were not changed. The eCQM value set addendum for 2017 is published to the eCQM Library and the eCQI Resource Center. The NLM’s Value Set Authority Center also provides a complete list of revisions to the eCQM value sets.

Nearly 90 percent of healthcare organizations suffer data breaches according to the Ponemon Institute. ^[1] The level of data breaches is predicted to continue to grow.^[4] What if there was a technology to better encrypt our health data, while also providing improved access to comprehensive health data for a patient? The quality of healthcare would rise, patient satisfaction would increase by leaps and bounds and costs would likely fall.  Sound idylic?

Medicare for all?

"We’re going to have insurance for everybody,” President-elect Donald Trump told the Washington Post in an interview over the weekend.  "I don’t want single-payer. What I do want is to be able to take care of people.”  So while we hear of Affordable Care Act (ACA, sometimes called Obamacare) repeal during the first 100 days of the administration, it sounds as if new programs must be quickly in the works to meet his mandate. “ The Congress can’t get cold feet because the people will not let that happen,” Trump continued, giving further emphasis to his push (and probably tweets) behind this initiative.

With the introduction of MIPS reporting in 2017, and the launch of MIPSPRO, now is the time to be considering efficient ways of fulfilling MIPS requirements. CMS is conducting a study with the aim of better understanding practice's experiences quality reporting that will satisfy the Improvement Activities Performance Category of the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS). Applications for this study are going to be accepted from January 1 - 31, 2017.

As I sit in my office, I hear the Christmas decorations coming down.  There is comfort in the known passing of the seasons and excitement at Healthmonix as we move into MIPS for 2017.  Our new platform for MIPS is ready for launch.  We are excited to see our efforts pay off for healthcare.

While the national election means that the Affordable Care Act will likely be changed, MACRA was passed with wide bipartisan support so will likely be staying in place. We at Healthmonix don’t believe the change in administration will affect the underlying efforts to transition to value-based care, either for MIPS or any other initiatives that we currently support.  The triple aim (better care, lower cost, better patient experience) is still at the heart of what we do.    

When reporting individual quality measures, whether it be for PQRS this year, or for one of the performance categories of MIPS next year, you are expected to report at least 50% of your eligible instances for each measure. In our experience, this concept can be confusing when practically applied. Luckily, it can be disambigusted in five easy steps!

 Consider All Patient Visits for the Performance Period

A performance period for PQRS is based on a complete calendar year beginning on January 1 and ending on December 31. 

For MIPS reporting, the performance period can range from a continuous 90-day period to the full calendar year.

Last night, a very surprising article was promoted, "CMS waves Physician Quality Reporting System penalties for 2017, 2018 after massive ICD-10 update clogs system." This post makes it seem as if only the Value-Based Modifier (VM) program penalties and incentives would still be in effect based on PQRS reporting done in 2015 and 2016. This is a dangerous misconception.

Once you've selected how you will report, the next step is to determine what you will report. This is called your reporting method. You have two options: reporting a measures group or reporting individual measures. 

Last week, we discussed the first step to reporting PQRS in 2016, selecting a submission mechanism. To briefly recap, there are three submission mechanisms that are viable for practices starting to report at this point in the year: Registry, EHR, and QCDR. Of these three options, Registry reporting has the highest rate of success and ease of submission. 

We call it “Informal Review Season”.  You could also call it “the Nightmare Vaguely Before Christmas” for
 providers who bill Medicare Part B services.  The 2015 PQRS Informal Review season (this year September 26th through November 30th) is that most wonderful time of the year when practitioners and practice administrators nervously await the release of feedback reports in September.  Instead of children wondering whether or not they’ve made Santa’s list, you’ve got providers and practitioners feverishly paging through their QRURs to see exactly how naughty or nice they are, according to CMS.  (Note: Documents released in the fall of 2016 pertain to the 2015 PQRS or VBM reporting period).